More Insults For Good Parents: Syracuse Family Court Magistrate Insulated From Accountability

In a recent post, we featured a 15 page report and demand for resignation submitted to Syracuse Family Court Magistrate James Gorman. This came only days following a related comprehensive report naming the same magistrate in a complaint filed with the New York Commission on Judicial Conduct. First Amendment retaliation was evident from the text and impact of a support decision by Magistrate Gorman issued within days of this complaint. It went so far as to fabricate a PhD degree for support purposes while admitting to intentional violations of statute. The illegal acts of this magistrate caused Leon Koziol, an outspoken parental advocate, to lose newly secured employment.

Numerous violations of the state’s Judicial Code of Conduct were cited in both complaints. Because a support magistrate is subject to local administrative review, a second complaint was necessarily filed and promptly referred to a referee (“special counsel”). Only one week later, a response letter arrived stating that nothing would be investigated here. This follows additional concessions in another “confidential” forum that the state was in fact targeting the public criticisms of Leon Koziol. In short, the subjects of criticism are going to every extreme to punish the whistleblower. Welcome to America.

Below you will find a two page rebuttal which summarizes this shocking display of retaliation and injustice. An independent Judicial Review Commission has been proposed to overcome the inaction and whitewashing of judicial misconduct. Self regulation of our judiciary is simply not working to benefit the people who entrust such important duties to the public servants in our third branch of government operations. We are presently engaged in soliciting investments and donations behind this cause. We need extensive resources to be able to come into your individual communities and root out misconduct through investigation, report and complaints before the media and related government entities. Please look us up at Leon Koziol.com and make your contribution today.

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Office of Leon R. Koziol
Civil Rights Advocate
1518 Genesee Street
Utica, NY 13502
leonkoziol@gmail.com
(315) 796-4000

May 30, 2013

Gerard J. Neri
Special Counsel
Fifth Judicial District
Onondaga County Courthouse
Syracuse, New York 13202

Re: Support Magistrate James Gorman

Dear Mr. Neri:

On May 13, 2013, I submitted a 15-page resignation demand and formal complaint regarding serious ethical misconduct and gross incompetence exhibited by Onondaga County Support Magistrate James Gorman. It was provided to Family Court Judge Martha Walsh-Hood consistent with a procedure outlined by a Family Court clerk. I then received a May 16, 2013 letter from Judge Hood acknowledging my “complaint letters” and informing me that the matter was being assigned to you “for review and response”.

One week later, I received your letter dated May 23, 2013 which concluded the entire matter with peculiar, boiler-plate statements to the effect that “it appears you are objecting to legal decisions made by Support Magistrate Gorman…   that this office does not have authority to intercede in litigation or over-turn decisions of the Judges within the District… however, any objections to decisions/orders of the Support Magistrate should be made in accordance with the statutory requirements of the State of New York”.

I am appalled that such text was actually contained in a formal statement under the office letterhead of James Tormey as Fifth District Administrative Judge. To this, I have two questions: who are you, and did you read my submissions? If you are a referee for judicial incompetence and misconduct, the Walsh-Hood transfer notice did not specify this. And if you had read my material, you would have discovered the identity of your immediate supervisor as a related subject of complaint. In that case, consistent with ethical duties of a lawyer or a judge, I am not sure which classification fits your job description, you should have disqualified yourself.

When I submitted my complaint, I did so on the good faith premise that an independent entity was in place to investigate and prosecute violations of our state’s judicial Code of Ethics. It “would appear” that there are no such ethics applicable to this hybrid animal known as a “support magistrate”. Like you, he or she is treated as neither a judge nor an attorney. Therefore these publicly paid officials can go about abusing government authority by simply making up material facts and exploiting them to suppress the free exercise of First Amendment rights.

Is it “competent” to find that I possessed a PhD contrary to anything stated in a court record and then abuse such a fact to orchestrate a jail-able support violation in retaliation for offensive public criticisms? Did you really think that I was unaware of the “objections” and “appeals” process? If you read my submissions, you would have known that I was complaining about gross incompetence and judicial misconduct of Magistrate Gorman derived from matters outside of the court record. As “special” counsel, you would then also have known that such matters are not subject to either “objections” or “appeals”. Even a rudimentary reading would have caused you to conclude that Magistrate Gorman was being grieved for his proximate retaliation upon my filing of a published complaint against him before the Judicial Conduct Commission.

This decision came only days after the publicized event, more than six months since our support hearing concluded, and five months after the same decision was promised on the record. The delay alone was bad enough. To reiterate aspects of my complaint, Magistrate Gorman admitted to intentional violations of “statutory requirements of the State of New York” in his decision copied upon you. This is not simply an issue for appeal. It is an unethical and unlawful act which caused me to lose a new job. An appeal of his decision will not get the job back. It is furthermore unethical for you to “shoe-horn” my complaint within the convenient confines of a support case in order to insulate a colleague in the same courthouse from accountability. This is a complaint showing numerous violations of ethical code requiring a truly impartial and detached review.

Only today, the Syracuse Post Standard and Syracuse.com featured a civil rights case by a professor against SUNY Institute of Technology for First Amendment retaliation resulting in a $600,000 verdict, or the same amount obtained against your boss for violating similar rights of a Family Court clerk. A support magistrate may attempt to claim immunity from monetary recovery of this kind, but he or she is not immune from ethical accountability for the same unlawful act. Otherwise there would be no purpose to any code of ethics, conduct commission or your “office” for that matter. Please do the right thing here by disqualifying yourself so that a proper “review and response” can be made in connection with this very serious matter.

The public has a right to expect some kind of accountability in our third branch of government operations. A truly impartial “support magistrate” would not only honor our ethical codes but he would commence every case with notice to the litigants that they are being subjected to a tax as well as a child support obligation in any final order. I have explained the logic of this in my submissions but that would of course impair the same magistrate’s overall impartiality due to a financial stake in the outcome (principally impairing fathers and non-custodial mothers). This is all part of my continuing effort to alert you of an escalation in tensions and violence arising from this kind of bureaucratic cycle of abuse, harming good parents, families and innocent children.

Very truly yours,

Leon R. Koziol

Cc: Martha Walsh-Hood
Judicial Conduct Commission
U.S. Justice Department
Syracuse Post Standard

With One Judge Removed From Family Court, Koziol Seeks Removal of Another

Just when you thought it was safe to return to court, along comes another example of misconduct and gross incompetence which we have targeted in the Syracuse Onondaga County Family Court. Parents entering this arena are at risk of similar victimization and should pass out flyers at the courthouse steps to demand corrective action on a daily basis. The people of Syracuse, New York must take a hard look at what is happening in their public system of justice.

After going through nearly 30 trial level judges in the past seven years of a once uncontested divorce, Leon Koziol has announced that enough is enough. No more payments will be made to this “child support” bureaucracy fraudulently declaring itself to be acting in the “best interests of our children.” A letter has been issued directly to a support magistrate demanding his resignation after another judge, Bryan Hedges, of the same Family Court was removed by the state’s top court last week for sexual abuse upon a handicapped five year old niece.

Once again, you just can’t make this stuff up. Apparently only our protected judges can do this as a Family Court magistrate, James Gorman, actually manufactured a PhD among Mr. Koziol’s professional qualifications to support his “finding” that imputed income can be satisfied with no reduction in obligations. There is much more, and you simply have to read the entire demand letter attached here. It can be used as a template for your own demands, as we continue cleansing judicial office across the country from its corruption and misconduct upon good Americans.

After Koziol publicized his last complaint to the New York Commission on Judicial Conduct, this “child support” magistrate, named in that complaint, evidently abused his position in revenge so that free speech of the kind found at Leon Koziol.com can be utterly shut down. Whether you are a support victim, a subject of child alienation, a police officer sworn to uphold this system or a common taxpayer who pays for it all, this story must be told. More important, it must be read completely, and it must be circulated everywhere to promote “free press” that is being harmed.

Your parenting and childrearing crises are only going to get worse unless you join our civil rights movement and take real action. As this site shows throughout, there is extensive drive and professional qualifications to secure long overdue reform to our divorce and Family Courts. But it cannot be done without proper resources against a bureaucracy so large and out of control. If ten people can invest $10,000 a piece instead of donating it to useless lawyers, we can get a good start and begin entering your cases and courthouses to expose similar abuses. Maybe you have the connections to assist in our fundraising and reform efforts. For every abused child, and our moral fiber as a nation, we are running out of time! Stay tuned, more alarming news to follow.

See Request For James Gorman’s Resignation (Click Here)

Former Deputy Involved in Custody Dispute Convicted of Killing Ex-Wife

Today’s latest story of FCIV (Family Court Inspired Violence) comes from The Roanoke Times:

Read Story (Click Here)

Almost every single day, we receive countless stories about good fathers getting “screwed over” in the court room. As previously expressed here at LeonKoziol.com, we believe that litigant abuses taking place in family court involving divorce, custody and child support matters are leading to far more violence than what is actually being reported by the news media today. So, why isn’t anything being done about this? For starters, anyone who attempts to expose such information would more than likely run the definite risk of retaliation (see report). Who would possibly retaliate and why (see report) ? The answer may come as quite a surprise.

By acknowledging and admitting the detailed existence of such abuses (see the elephant in the room picture above) not only would it be an indictment of the entire legal profession and judiciary but, even more so, it would prove to be a public relations nightmare and embarrassment of the worst kind for our nation’s family courts. Especially, when their personal self-serving financial interests are routinely satisfied at the expense of predominately male litigant victims in what has now become a multi-billion dollar child control industry. It’s often these same fathers who find themselves unexpectedly placed on the defensive in the majority of court proceedings, whereby custody determination is routinely awarded to the mother as evidenced by the indisputable recent U.S. Census Bureau statistics (Table 2, page 6). Sadly, there seems to be a growing trend amongst these victims, including those with established law enforcement careers, like Jonathan Agee and others, who feel “locked out” of this very same system, which they had at one time pledged to honor and uphold. As a result, they see no alternative but, to take the law into their own hands.

However, thanks to the courageous efforts of Leon Koziol, J.D, who sacrificed a lucrative law practice, as well as countless others who have worked diligently to expose these injustices, the truth is getting out and spreading like a wild fire. While we do not condone violence in any such manner, Leon Koziol, J.D.’s, recent report to the Judicial Conduct Commission was intended to serve as a wake up call and continues to reinforce that both corrective action and reform must take place in order to prevent similar future tragedies from occurring. Ironically, this same report contains and eerily similar paragraph that reads much like the Roanoke Times story and involved a member of our own local law enforcement community, who after support court was reportedly reduced to living on $26 per week.

“As our domestic courts degenerate from their constitutional design to a money-driven enterprise, violence is increasing on an alarming scale. One of many cases that may corroborate this trend is Pearce v Longo, 766 F. Supp. 2d 367 (NDNY, 2011) where a police officer executed a murder-suicide leaving three children without parents. Abusive court processes were ignored as a cause. I urge your members to examine this submission carefully. It sheds new light on a spreading cancer and will be shared with the Justice Department and Human Rights Division. As the band plays on, our state is sinking to new lows in moral fiber, public service and family preservation.”

At LeonKoziol.com, we are proud to salute those in law enforcement who risk their lives to protect and serve us. It’s our sincere hope that meaningful reform can be achieved and future tragedies can be averted. We ask that you kindly consider making a contribution to the Parenting Rights Institute (using PayPal link on side of page) in order to help offset the cost of our ongoing efforts.

Thank you in advance for your support.

More Family Court Inspired Violence?

Within moments of parental advocate Leon Koziol, J.D., releasing an alarming 28 Page report which predicted an increase in violence arising from litigant abuses in our courts, we were made aware of this tragic story from the Chicago Tribune. (Read Story Here). We are not suggesting the family court or litigant abuse was the cause of these senseless killings nor are we condoning these random acts of violence.

However, as previously expressed here at LeonKoziol.com, we continue to believe that a strong correlation undoubtedly exists between ongoing custody battles and the violence arising from litigant abuses which can be found in a variety of mainstream news media reports. Mr. Koziol’s recent report to the Judicial Conduct Commission was intended to further serve as a wake up call in hopes that both corrective action and reform can take place in an effort to prevent similar future tragedies from occurring.

A random Google Internet search of the terms “custody battle lead to killings,” revealed these disturbing recent news headlines:

News Story 1 (Click Here)
News Story 2 (Click Here)
News Story 3 (Click Here)
News Story 4 (Click Here)
News Story 5 (Click Here)

Could these unnecessary deaths have been prevented? We want to hear your thoughts.

Fatherhood Crisis in America: Protect Yourself Today!

Don’t wait for the family courts to destroy your parent-child relationship. Get the Parenting Rights Institute self-guided DVD TODAY!

Learn How To:

* Protect yourself from litigation abuse
* Avoid the high legal costs of a custody or child support battle
* Preserve sensitive family relations and protect your personal information

Call 796-4000 or order online at the Parenting Rights Institute website (Click Here)

CAN’T AFFORD A LAWYER IN CUSTODY COURT: READ THIS!

$140,000. That’s what it cost one divorced couple recently to complete a custody case involving two children. You are reading that correctly, spelled out, it’s one hundred forty thousand dollars! We’re not talking about wealthy or prominent people here, no movie stars like Tom Cruise or Alec Baldwin. It involved two middle class parents who could not afford an appeal after the money ran out, after mom kept custody of one child and dad was able to get custody of the other. Neither was happy with the outcome instigated by lawyers who depleted both parents of their savings and assets. Their children were put in the middle of a winner-take-all court contest.

It turned out great for the lawyers, however, because there are no losers on their side of this contest. They simply shrugged off any negative outcomes before moving on to their next victims, typically explaining the bad parts with complex distractions and even blaming their own clients for coming to them. “It was their decision to fight”, they might say, never mind how the laws created this contest and how an unequal doctrine of parenting necessitated the fight. No one gave them a candid portrayal of how the custody system actually works, how it damaged the targeted children by fleecing them of their college funds and dreams. When the money ran out, so did the lawyers, leaving a hapless pair like these two on their own to clean up the mess.

Now parents are fighting back with the purchase of a court management program designed to educate divorce and Family Court candidates before they are turned into victims. It was prepared by Dr. Leon R. Koziol, civil rights advocate and founder of the Parenting Rights Institute. Consisting of a seminar DVD and five part reading program, it promotes litigation substitutes such as mediation and agreement. Details can be found at www.parentingrightsinstitute.com. A recent purchaser has offered her recommendation of this product. In addition to others: Here is what Cindy had to say:

“After running out of money for my lawyer, I discovered the program offered on-line by the Parenting Rights Institute. I digested it in my spare time and was able to go confidently into court and win a motion against my adversary. This was the same lawyer that was costing my ex-husband so much money. I wish I had access to this program before I hired my own lawyer. I could have saved myself and my children so much money and grief. It was worth every penny. If you would like to know more about my experience with this program as a parent, contact me through the Institute at (315) 796-4000.” ~ Cindy H., Syracuse, NY.

Starting today, and for a brief holiday period only, this program can be obtained by making a donation in the amount of $250. The product retails for $350 on any other site across the country where it is being made available, a savings of $100. Once you’ve activated the donate button below, please complete all requested fields. Once payment is confirmed, your program will be shipped out within 3-5 business days. You can also make your donation by submitting a check or money to: Parenting Rights Institute, 1518 Genesee Street, Utica, NY 13502.

Parenting Institute Offers Writing Services to Divorce and Family Victims

Perhaps you have had your children needlessly taken from you, the divorce process may have caused your boy or girl to become alienated, your life’s earning were seized to satisfy endless controversy created by lawyers. You wanted to be properly heard, but the opportunity was wrongfully denied. Whatever your ordeal, you have a story which needs to be told.

That’s why the Parenting Rights Institute is offering writing, editing and publishing services to those who have this need but lack the professional skills to make it a reality. It may be the one thing which your family and friends read some day which sheds the proper light upon you as a genuine loving person. It may even attract the attention of a movie producer, news reporter or other audience that you are targeting.

Over the years, we at the Parenting Rights Institute have received stories from people who could not get justice in divorce and Family Court. Despite the best efforts of so many parental advocates that we have come to know, reform is not going to happen anytime soon. The multi-billion dollar industry built around our children is simply too lucrative and politically influential.

Your greatest contribution, therefore, may be a book, petition, news release or other diverse publication that accords you some measure of justice or accomplishment. You are hoping to share your experience so that others will not fall victim. It’s the kind of project which can get you more peace of mind than any court therapist can provide. And you are the one in command.

If you have such a need, or know someone who does, feel free to contact our Institute at (315) 796-4000 or leonkoziol@parentingrightsinstitute.com. You can also mail us a confidential proposal for a negotiable price at our office: Parenting Rights Institute; 1518 Genesee Street; Utica, New York 13502. Our founder, Dr. Leon Koziol, has published extensive work and editorials over a 25 year period, including a court avoidance program and novel available at Leon Koziol.com. This is your crucial life story. Don’t let others define it.

Petraeus Scandal Highlights Flaws in America’s Divorce and Custody Courts

Administrators Note: Please help us with our efforts here at www.leonkoziol.com by sharing Dr. Koziol’s latest commentary with all media, social network and personal contacts .

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

By  Dr. Leon R. Koziol

What was our CIA Director doing in a domestic relations case trying to influence its outcome? David Petraeus resigned as Director of our nation’s highest intelligence agency after promoting a “non-custodial” mother deemed to be “psychologically unstable” by the presiding judge of a local custody court. This mother was not only a lawyer who knew how to influence the system from outside, but she happened to be the twin sister of a Florida socialite rumored to be one of two mistresses in possession of national security information.

The scenario gets complicated. Apparently, some kind of love triangle erupted between two women associates and Petraeus, all married, which got out of control. The scandal came to light after one mistress began doing battle with the other in order to obtain exclusive “access” rights to the Director. But this was no garden variety affair of the kind which damaged a former president and the governors of two large states. This one threatened the interests of national security while exposing the flaws in America’s divorce and custody courts.

For starters, a bimbo battle here at home is no reason to expose outsiders to secrets that could endanger the lives of our military overseas. As for our domestic court system, the scheme to influence a custody case supports what our Parenting Rights Institute has been warning all along. These archaic and lucrative custody laws are harming the health, productivity and welfare of an entire nation. It is a central argument of a civil rights case now before the United States Supreme Court which is scheduled for conference on November 20, 2012.

The case, John Parent v State of New York, asks our nation’s highest court to strike down over-broad classifications of “custody” and “non-custody” which lead to controversies of the kind which involved our nation’s CIA Director. While he was offering parenting opinions about a non-relative and his official influence to a local judge, security issues were emerging across the Middle East and South Asia. Mandated custody titles force parents to war over their offspring in a needless and sometimes barbaric contest that draws countless people away from crucial jobs.

A multi-billion dollar industry has resulted which, like other forms of economic exploitation, insulates itself from public criticism. This is why conscientious lawyers are suppressed or removed altogether when they try to advance progressive and gender neutral reforms. Indeed the John Parent case reads like a John Grisham novel with refreshing honesty which can never be matched by our ex-Director’s biographer. It has caused our institute to offer parents a court management program as the substitute for destructive court battles. Visit us at www.Leon Koziol.com.

Dr. Leon R. Koziol
President and Founder
Parenting Rights Institute
1518 Genesee Street
Utica, New York 13502
(315) 796-4000

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

If you’ve been following our hard work and sacrifices on your behalf, you will hopefully recognize the need to help us secure financial resources. Kindly consider supporting our efforts!

Parents Fight Back With Program to Avoid Cost of Divorce and Custody

$140,000. That’s what it cost one divorced couple recently to complete a custody case involving two children. You are reading that correctly, spelled out, it’s one hundred forty thousand dollars! We’re not talking about wealthy or prominent people here, no movie stars like Tom Cruise or Alec Baldwin. It involved two middle class parents who could not afford an appeal after the money ran out, after mom kept custody of one child and dad was able to get custody of the other. Neither was happy with the outcome instigated by lawyers who depleted both parents of their savings and assets. Their children were put in the middle of a winner-take-all court contest.

It turned out great for the lawyers, however, because there are no losers on their side of this contest. They simply shrugged off any negative outcomes before moving on to their next victims, typically explaining the bad parts with complex distractions and even blaming their own clients for coming to them. “It was their decision to fight”, they might say, never mind how the laws created this contest and how an unequal doctrine of parenting necessitated the fight. No one gave them a candid portrayal of how the custody system actually works, how it damaged the targeted children by fleecing them of their college funds and dreams. When the money ran out, so did the lawyers, leaving a hapless pair like these two on their own to clean up the mess.

Now parents are fighting back with the purchase of a court management program designed to educate divorce and Family Court candidates before they are turned into victims. It was prepared by Dr. Leon R. Koziol, civil rights advocate and founder of the Parenting Rights Institute. Consisting of a seminar DVD and five part reading program, it promotes litigation substitutes such as mediation and agreement. Details can be found at www.parentingrightsinstitute.com. A recent purchaser has offered her recommendation of this product. In addition to others: Here is what Cindy had to say:

“After running out of money for my lawyer, I discovered the program offered on-line by the Parenting Rights Institute. I digested it in my spare time and was able to go confidently into court and win a motion against my adversary. This was the same lawyer that was costing my ex-husband so much money. I wish I had access to this program before I hired my own lawyer. I could have saved myself and my children so much money and grief. It was worth every penny. If you would like to know more about my experience with this program as a parent, contact me through the Institute at (315) 796-4000.” ~ Cindy H., Syracuse, NY.

Starting today, and for a brief holiday period only, this program can be obtained by making a donation in the amount of $250. The product retails for $350 on any other site across the country where it is being made available, a savings of $100. Once you’ve activated the donate button below, please complete all requested fields. Once payment is confirmed, your program will be shipped out within 3-5 business days. You can also make your donation by submitting a check or money to: Parenting Rights Institute, 1518 Genesee Street, Utica, NY 13502.

Veterans Promoted in John Parent Case; Supreme Court Sets Conference For November 20th

On November 5, 2012, the United States Supreme Court set a conference date of November 20, 2012 to decide whether it will hear a parenting case designed, in part, to promote the rights of veterans. John Parent is a pseudonym intended to represent parents victimized by an antiquated classification structure in America’s domestic relations courts, see i.e. Webster v Ryan, 729 NYS 2d 315 at fn 1. “Custodial” and “non-custodial” titles are mandated under Title IV-D of the Social Security Act in order for states to receive federal funding for their childrearing operations.

The inferior classification is broadly applied to responsible, abusive and absentee parents alike to cause needless stigma and lucrative conflict. It is retained contrary to the logic of equal treatment, flexible agreement or parenting orders because superior and inferior titles facilitate money transfers and a multi-billion dollar child control industry. The statutory scheme which supports this government industry is being challenged on constitutional grounds similar to the privacy right secured for women in the case of Roe v Wade. As explained to the Supreme Court:

No regard is given to the predictable conflict and vast injury which this doctrine inflicts upon families. Innocent children are left misguided and confused over the course of their lives, fathers are deprived of love and affection upon return from military service, “non-custodial” mothers are needlessly stigmatized before their own offspring, and diverse victims are invented of the kind featured here. (Petition page 4).

The damage to our family heritage, health care and productivity as a nation is at stake along with suicide rates and traumatic events experienced by our veterans upon becoming reacquainted with their domestic lives. This particular parent known as the American veteran is especially harmed by “custody” and “support” laws which continue to promote outdated and sexist doctrines to the effect that a mother’s place is at home caring for the children and a father’s role is to pay for her services. To be sure, select impacts are presented at pg 3 of the John Parent case:

In short, we find a scheme of federal and state laws which promotes the manufacture of absentee parents and “dead beat dads” (a sexist slur actually employed by the U.S. Justice Department in public releases). Has not the time finally arrived to infuse some measure of balance and logic to childrearing dispositions in our nation’s domestic relations courts? Do not our military and law enforcement deserve better when they resume their parenting roles after protecting and preserving a way of life we take for granted?

The Parenting Rights Institute continues to struggle with its goal of financing precedent seeking litigation like the John Parent case. We need the help of concerned veterans, like minded parents and their extended family so that our children can be returned to the people consistent with rights guaranteed to us under the Ninth and Tenth Amendments. Donations can be made at Leon Koziol.com. For those parents victimized by this system, a court management program is offered at www.familyretention.com. Proceeds help pay for these costly efforts. You can contact us directly at (315) 796-4000.