Parental Advocate Leon Koziol Releases Alarming Report to Judicial Conduct Commission

After 23 years of success as a civil rights attorney, Leon R. Koziol, J.D., predicts increase in violence arising from litigant abuses in our courts.

Many of our followers have asked what really happened to Leon Koziol to cause his law license to be suspended after 23 years of successful litigation on behalf of civil rights victims. Over the years, we have dodged such questions due to “confidential” processes and the monitoring of critical positions and reform efforts featured here.

Well it’s time to tell the story, and this ordeal may shock you. It all began after he exposed corruption and abuses in matters of custody, child support and parental alienation. The details are now provided in a report submitted to the New York Commission on Judicial Conduct which is being made public today. Many victims of government abuse have sought representation but were necessarily turned away.

As the report explains, free speech retributions by employees and judges of New York’s court system have prevented Leon Koziol from resuming his private law practice. Followers of our work have gained valuable insights into the realities faced by parents and families when they enter our nation’s domestic relations courts. Two moms and one dad recently disclosed that such insights actually turned their cases around. This information is free, study it wisely. We hope that it can benefit you and groups everywhere for the sake of our children. Call us at (315) 796-4000.

Download Entire Report Here at Scribd (Click Here)

Additional Notes: 

* Please assist us with distributing this report to your news, social media, individual and group contacts.

* Court arguments are set to occur in Albany, NY at the Third Department appeals court on Wednesday, April 24, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. regarding Mr. Koziol’s civil suit against the state.

PRI Court Program Successful For Both Moms and Dads

For all you moms affected by our nation’s divorce and Family Courts, it is important to convince you that we are helping both moms and dads in this reform movement. As you may guess, we have detractors endeavoring to suppress our joint efforts. Here is one e-mail received today. Please help our cause with donations, references and purchasers of this Court Program. It’s proving very successful as this victim explains:

——– Original Message ——–
Subject: Judge Walsh Hood
From: Saaserud
Date: Wed, February 27, 2013 10:14 am
To: leonkoziol@parentingrightsinstitute.com

Hi Leon,

Not sure if you remember me, but you were kind enough to answer your phone back in September to discuss Walsh Hood. I just returned from a hearing with Hood and my ex-husband’s attorney and they tried to bowl over me as a pro se litigant. I could not believe what she was trying to do so I got right in her face and told her I wanted an immediate adjournment and that I was going to appeal any decision that she makes and that I am taking this case to the judicial review board. She immediately backed down. And I won my argument.

So you know, I blatantly told her that she did not allow me to speak or answer her questions as a pro se litigant and that her entire court as well as the Plaintiff have been unfair to me. The other attorney would not answer any of my calls or emails for two months and I called him out on the NY Code of Conduct for Attorneys regarding communications with and treatment of pro se litigants. The judge was trying to amend my divorce decree without proper motions filed etc. I told her that she could not do that without the proper motions and arguments. I also told her that I intended to request a copy of the transcripts from my meeting with her to prove that she was violating my rights.

At the end, she was nice as can be and the other side got nothing and I got a 53 day extension on the issue of the repairs and sale of my house.

Thanks so much for your assistance. I don’t think this judge will try to violate my rights again.

Oh, by the way, my client got a $42.8 mil award from Nationwide Insurance due to my work and testimony. I am in the process of working on a multi-billion dollar class action suit and have a PR campaign about to be launched. This business is fun.

Hope all is well with you and that you are successful in your current endeavors.

Shelley Aaserud

Petraeus Scandal Highlights Flaws in America’s Divorce and Custody Courts

Administrators Note: Please help us with our efforts here at www.leonkoziol.com by sharing Dr. Koziol’s latest commentary with all media, social network and personal contacts .

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

By  Dr. Leon R. Koziol

What was our CIA Director doing in a domestic relations case trying to influence its outcome? David Petraeus resigned as Director of our nation’s highest intelligence agency after promoting a “non-custodial” mother deemed to be “psychologically unstable” by the presiding judge of a local custody court. This mother was not only a lawyer who knew how to influence the system from outside, but she happened to be the twin sister of a Florida socialite rumored to be one of two mistresses in possession of national security information.

The scenario gets complicated. Apparently, some kind of love triangle erupted between two women associates and Petraeus, all married, which got out of control. The scandal came to light after one mistress began doing battle with the other in order to obtain exclusive “access” rights to the Director. But this was no garden variety affair of the kind which damaged a former president and the governors of two large states. This one threatened the interests of national security while exposing the flaws in America’s divorce and custody courts.

For starters, a bimbo battle here at home is no reason to expose outsiders to secrets that could endanger the lives of our military overseas. As for our domestic court system, the scheme to influence a custody case supports what our Parenting Rights Institute has been warning all along. These archaic and lucrative custody laws are harming the health, productivity and welfare of an entire nation. It is a central argument of a civil rights case now before the United States Supreme Court which is scheduled for conference on November 20, 2012.

The case, John Parent v State of New York, asks our nation’s highest court to strike down over-broad classifications of “custody” and “non-custody” which lead to controversies of the kind which involved our nation’s CIA Director. While he was offering parenting opinions about a non-relative and his official influence to a local judge, security issues were emerging across the Middle East and South Asia. Mandated custody titles force parents to war over their offspring in a needless and sometimes barbaric contest that draws countless people away from crucial jobs.

A multi-billion dollar industry has resulted which, like other forms of economic exploitation, insulates itself from public criticism. This is why conscientious lawyers are suppressed or removed altogether when they try to advance progressive and gender neutral reforms. Indeed the John Parent case reads like a John Grisham novel with refreshing honesty which can never be matched by our ex-Director’s biographer. It has caused our institute to offer parents a court management program as the substitute for destructive court battles. Visit us at www.Leon Koziol.com.

Dr. Leon R. Koziol
President and Founder
Parenting Rights Institute
1518 Genesee Street
Utica, New York 13502
(315) 796-4000

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

If you’ve been following our hard work and sacrifices on your behalf, you will hopefully recognize the need to help us secure financial resources. Kindly consider supporting our efforts!

Is Chen Guangcheng Really Any Safer in the United States?

Recently we featured a blog entry in regards to Chen Guangcheng, the blind Chinese legal activist who fled house arrest and sought refuge with U.S. diplomats after local officials waged a vendetta against him for exposing a campaign of forced abortions and other abuses of China’s harsh birth control policy. Over the weekend we learned from the Los Angeles Times that Chen Guangcheng is now safe in the U.S.

Read full story (Click Here)

We are asking our followers here at www.leonkoziol.com, to contact the following reporters (both email and follow-up telephone calls) whose names appear in this article and let them know the truth about how non-custodial parents are treated here in the United States. They may be surprised to learn that those who dare challenge our very own current domestic relations policies are often treated in a similar manner much like that of Chen Guangcheng. Perhaps these reporters could provide a sufficient explanation as to why this is?

Furthermore, Presidential hopeful Mitt Romney also appears to need some schooling on our nation’s domestic relations policies. Mr. Romney was quick to criticize the Obama administration for its handling of this particular matter, however, in the next breath he stated, “This episode underscores the need for the United States to forthrightly stand up for the human rights of the Chinese people,” when referring to Mr. Guangcheng’s safe arrival in the United States. In our opinion here at www.leonkoziol.com, we believe that Mr. Romney would be wise to educate himself in advance with respect to the hypocritical state of human rights here in the United States faced by non-custodial parents, before attacking his political adversaries and advocating  for the rights of foreign countries in an effort to garner political support.

Los Angeles Times
Mailing Address:
202 W. 1st St.
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Phone: (213) 237-5000

lisa.mascaro@latimes.com

barbara.demick@latimes.com

andrew.tangel@latimes.com

Mascaro reported from Washington, Demick from Beijing and Tangel from New York.

Staff writers Paul Richter and Christi Parsons in Camp David, Md., contributed to this report.

Family Courts: Have They Been Compromised?

Have our family courts been compromised?

Since the inception of this website, our staff here at www.leonkoziol.com has tried to keep the majority of our content focused largely upon issues surrounding what we believe is the state’s ever-expanding intrusions upon private child-rearing matters. Occasionally, there is sufficient reason to feature other stories and information which may not necessarily have anything to do with parental rights, but rather illustrate the growing frustrations that American’s are experiencing with our government today when conventional remedies such as the family courts and public acts of civil disobedience simply do not work.  In no way are we advocating or suggesting violence. However, we will continue to ask the same question that repeatedly goes unanswered when our public officials are called upon; what recourse do citizens of the United States of America have when they continue to be ignored by their government?

What are the family courts afraid of?

There is little doubt that the drum beat is growing louder with each new day. American citizens are being wrongfully and systematically pushed to a breaking point of disenfranchisement with their government. The first video is eerily similar to what many non-custodial parents (particularly fathers) routinely experience as they are unfairly treated in our nation’s family court rooms today. In this video, there are many parallels that can be made between Jesse Ventura’s frustrations with the court system’s refusal on the basis of jurisdictional reasons to hear his case involving what he believes is the Transportation Safety Administration’s unreasonable search and seizure policies not unlike what civil/parental rights advocate Leon Koziol, J.D. has experienced when attempting to bring test cases “on behalf of parents similarly situated” before our high courts. The truth is, these cases are simply falling on deaf ears because they are not politically correct and more than likely pose a specific threat to a predetermined political agenda. Rather than hear these cases and the Constitutional grounds for which they are built upon, we now have an entire legal profession dedicated to protecting itself by using the influence of the family courts to discredit those who dare challenge the system. Our role here at www.leonkoziol.com is to better educate and inform the reader as to what is actually occurring free of both government and corporate influence.

The second video depicts an agitated police state that will do whatever it takes to “neutralize” a perceived threat in order protect the “status quo” which would include shooting an innocent camera person. The logical question one is left to ponder is, are we now living in a third world country? Or, as Jesse Ventura best puts it, “the Fascist States of America.

Family Courts: Are they biased towards men?

Historically, children were regarded as the fathers pre-industrial assets and custody was out of question. Consequently, the ‘tender years’ doctrine dictated that young children be kept with their mothers (Newsweek, [Online], 1995). But as perceptions about parenthood changed, fathers have become just as much involved as mothers in nurturing their children. For this reason, today, many fathers in family court are seeking primary or joint custody of their children when a marriage or partnership is dissolved. However, it is questioned whether the  family court system is biased against men in matters involving custody and access to children when these family breakdowns occur. It can be argued that, when deciding custody and visitation, a family court gives the best interests of the child the highest priority and not gender (Levin ; Mills, [Online], 2003). Apparently, it is clear that in most custody cases; approximately 90% of the time, primary residential custody of children is awarded to mothers (McNeely, [Online], 1998), thus indicating the presence of gender bias in the family courts. It is our belief that children are deserving of equal time with both parents whenever possible. In theory, this sounds like a wonderful idea. Unfortunately, nothing is going to change anytime soon until those who have been affected by current draconian child support and custody laws decide to unite for the purpose of letting both our elected public officials and family courts know they’ve finally had enough.

However, there is one person who is uniquely qualified given his civil rights background. That man is Dr. Leon Koziol, J.D. Leon understands our complex legal system and recognizes that behind every major civil rights movement, the fast track for change has always been through the courts. Mr. Koziol continues to incur tremendous litigation costs for exposing what he believes is an inherently flawed scheme of multi-billion dollar child control laws that are designed to fleece mainstream parents of their financial resources through unnecessary court room manufactured controversies. In retaliation for his work, the state damaged Leon’s ability to represent people like yourself in various test cases litigated over the past few years. Rather than abandon the cause, Mr. Koziol simply restructured the litigation and continued in a pro se manner under the constitution which is his right. Unfortunately, this has left him with no financial resources to conclude these test cases on behalf of “parents similarly situated.” Over the next few weeks, Mr. Koziol will have to decide if there is enough financial support for him to continue with this important cause. Please show him your financial support today!

Show Support by Copying and Pasting the code below to your Website or Blog:

Have our <a href="http://leonkozioljd.wordpress.com/2011/11/07/family-courts-have-they-been-compromised">Family Courts</a> been compromised?

Parenting Rights Institute Picks Candidates for New York Supreme Court

As a group seeking to advance reform in domestic relations practices, it has become incumbent upon us to assist our followers with their choices for Supreme Court Justice in the Fifth Judicial District. Unfortunately, this race has received little attention given the impact it has upon our daily lives and we find many out there who are unfamiliar with it. In New York State, Supreme Court is not the highest court like it is in other states and the federal government. Here it is the trial level court with the broadest level of jurisdiction. This simply means that where lesser courts, i.e. Justice Court or Family Court might be unable to hear a particular matter because of limitations set by law, the Supreme Court would be able to decide the case. The Court of Appeals is the state’s high court situated in Albany.

However, this unique aspect of New York’s complex court system allows us to emphasize that Supreme Court is where matrimonial (divorce) cases are litigated, among other matters important to our Institute. For this reason, an evaluation may be useful to you even if you reside elsewhere in the country. Think of it as a litmus test. Bar associations, news media and political parties have screened nine candidates for four open seats. They have resulted in ratings and endorsements. To our knowledge, there has been nothing generated from independent family groups. Here we simply employ the term “well qualified” to mean a candidate best suited to advance the interests of moms, dads, children and families in our domestic relations courts.

PATRICK MACRAE is our first choice. We give him a “well qualified” rating because he has an outstanding mix of experience, credentials and moral fiber. Thirty years of trial experience in both civil and criminal cases is only a starting point for this candidate. As a former member of a prominent Syracuse law firm, Assistant Attorney General handling important matters of statewide concern and a sole practitioner for many years, Mr. Macrae is suited to address diverse matters coming before him as a judge. He is also very litigant oriented and reform minded.

JAMES McCLUSKEY is our second choice. We give him a “well qualified” rating because he possesses experience as a judge, following in the footsteps of his father in Watertown, New York, and appears fundamentally committed to the family. He will place the rights of parents above the command of the state and legal profession when necessary to avoid needless interference with childrearing. More than that, he will exercise the kind of temperament, restraint and common sense which is vital to the delivery of justice in potentially volatile family matters.

ERIN GALL is our third choice. Unlike some political and bar reviews, we give her a “well qualified” rating because of her commitment to family and close association with a prominent jurist in Oneida County. We respect those concerned over her inexperience and potential for prejudice upon victim fathers and non-custodial mothers seeking fair treatment. However, Ms. Gall appears destined to make a difference by committing herself with an open mind to studying the issues and taking needed reform in an area of law that is damaging families everywhere.

DAVID MAGNARELLI is not only our fourth choice, but the best of all nine candidates. When asked by the Syracuse Post Standard to identify his “hero”, Mr. Magnarelli prominently cited his immigrant parents. Unlike one political counterpart, this candidate did not direct voters to commission ratings or personal ambition. Instead, he sought to emulate famous New Yorkers from one party while quoting Abraham Lincoln from the other. It is this quote which we ask all candidates, win or lose, to observe after Election Day as it summarizes our reform efforts well:

“Discourage litigation. Persuade your neighbors to compromise whenever you can. Point
out to them how the nominal winner is often the real loser- in fees, expenses and waste of time.
As a peacemaker, the lawyer has the superior opportunity of being a good man.”

NOTE: We are having a phone effort all day on November 8, 2011 at our office, 1518 Genesee Street, Utica, to get the above candidates elected. We are focusing only on those voters that can be counted on. You can join us by calling (315) 796-4000. We were able to get some 25,000 votes behind Leon Koziol for Oneida County Executive in 2007. We can do it again for these choices. Finally, we suggest that if you reject any one of them for other reasons, please consider Thomas Buckel or Michael Young in his or her place.

Thomas Ball Society Announced – New Video Emerges!

PARENTING ALERT:  We’re making our next move. The Parenting Rights Institute today announced a proposal for the creation of the “Thomas Ball Society”. This group of parent, child and family advocates will join efforts across the nation in protest of a system of laws which is taking children from good parents on an escalating scale. In some cases, the seizure is carried out directly by state agencies purporting to act in our children’s so-called “best interests”. Using the same propaganda, the state seizes other children through oppressive “custody” and “support” processes which force parents to fight over their own offspring.

Sgt. Thomas Ball burned himself alive in front of the Cheshire County Superior Courthouse in Keene, New Hampshire this past June to bring attention and reform to these oppressive processes (see his manifesto). We cannot even relate to the level of commitment, sacrifice and pain this man endured in an effort to safeguard our American value systems. However, unlike the protester he was seeking to emulate in the Arab world uprisings, Tom’s event was profoundly suppressed and received hardly any mainstream news media coverage. You could imagine the opposite effect if a mother burned herself alive in protest of domestic violence at the same courthouse. Countless state agencies would benefit financially from the public outcry.

Tom stood for the most basic principles upon which our nation was founded. However, the child has been converted by the state into a multi-billion dollar industry – America’s new modern day version of capitalism. Our government will promote money interests not unlike Hitler promoted Nazi youth and Soviet imperialists promoted socialism. The difference here, of course, is that we have this thing called the Constitution. It was designed to check government advances upon our most cherished liberties. And there is no liberty or privacy interest more cherished than the right to rear our own children free from utopian philosophies and lucrative child transfers.

It is our job, as the “People” in that Constitution to place limits upon state power. Otherwise it is nothing more than parchment destined for sterility by an authoritative substitute. In this alert, we are providing you with a link to learn more about Thomas Ball. Also we are continuing to solicit donations behind the parenting rights litigation brought by Parental Rights Advocate Leon Koziol. In coming weeks, we will be contacting family rights leaders around the country to join this society. If you are interested, please contact us at admin@leonkoziol.com or leonkozioljd@gmail.com. You can also call direct at (315) 796-4000. The physical life of Thomas Ball may have been extinguished by a final dying ember at a courthouse of a small American town. But from Tom’s ashes, a patriotic spirit has been renewed which can never die.

The following news documentary video is courtesy of our liberty-minded friends at FreeKeene.Com which aired on July 18, 2011.  We would like to thank them for doing an outstanding job of producing such a fine masterpiece! As of today’s posting, this video has yet to receive the kind of viral-like circulation that it deserves amongst the parenting rights movement. Help spread the word – we encourage you to share this video of the Thomas Ball story with others in an effort to let the truth be known.

Here is a the direct URL:

Please consider making a donation to the Parenting Rights Institute today!
Your support is kindly appreciated.

A Personal Message From Parent Advocate Leon Koziol, J.D.

I am taking a few moments aside from my test litigation on behalf of parents across America to bring you a heart wrenching story from my home town newspaper. A mother released statements of her five year old girl at the sentencing of a drunk driver who caused the death of the little one’s father. “Mommy, when will I die so I can see Daddy again?” and “Mommy I think you and I should move to heaven so that we can be a family again.” The episode gave new life to causes such as Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) to prevent this kind of needless carnage.

However, a similar carnage is occurring every day in America’s domestic relations courts with little concern expressed by anyone. Fathers and “non-custodial” mothers are being routinely ripped from their children through profit making laws such as the “Child Support Standards Act”. Government bureaucrats, lawyers and forensic agents are feeding off of marital demise and orchestrated controversies surrounding mandatory custody and support awards. These “awards” also cause needless and permanent carnage between parent and child.

There are purple heart soldiers and public safety officers committing suicide in lieu of a “child support” debtors prison. Then there’s the case of  Thomas Ball in Keene, New Hampshire, separated from his children recently based upon a non-issue blown out of proportion by a so-called “child protection” agent. To prevent the mother from losing the same children to the state, this agent convinced her to file false charges as a “custody” tactic. After years of useless and costly processes, Tom burned himself alive in front of a courthouse to protest an oppressive state which took away his loved ones. Unlike the protester he was seeking to emulate in the freedom uprisings of the Arab world, virtually no one in America took notice.

There were no heart wrenching statements from the children who lost their daddies as a consequence of a capitalist based child control system which is harming the productivity, health care and family heritage of an entire nation. There were no criminal prosecutions or civil liability against the people masquerading as state agents who caused the deaths of these good Americans, one whose roots go back to the Revolutionary War. No one appeared at any sentencing hearing in the way of a Mothers Against Dead Daddies (MADD) to protest money abuses in our courts.

While attending to litigation in Manhattan recently, I had occasion to tour the Trade Center and Wall Street protests. Like so many of you, I supported the causes of freedom and liberty which these sites stood for. However, a focus was sorely needed. Such focus is easily found in our parenting rights cause because the abuses of our children and livelihoods will not be corrected without judicial reform. Unless our courts show a willingness to uphold our Constitution by making these money/child abusers accountable, little girls and boys will continue to ask the silent question “Daddy where are you?”

As stated in previous posts, resources have dwindled to nothing in connection with our current cases. We are therefore seeking contributions from all concerned. Such cases would cost individual litigants or groups hundreds of thousands in competent fees and litigation expense. It is therefore crucial for all of our supporters to join us in this effort. A pay pal account has been set up to accept your donation. No matter how great or small it may be, every amount helps. Please consider this using the method provided below or by mail to: Parenting Rights Institute; 1518 Genesee Street; Utica, New York 13502. Once again, we would like to thank all of you for your help.

Custody Battle Led to Deadly California Salon Shooting

Custody mayhem in California could have been avoided by reform litigation being pursued by parental rights advocate Leon Koziol, J.D. 

Regrettably, the kind of violence evidenced by this incident could have been prevented through the efforts of parental rights advocate Leon Koziol, J.D., and his test cases currently being reviewed by the United States Supreme Court and federal appeals court in New York City. This latest incident as predicted, was described in a post on his website www.leonkoziol.com only several days ago, appearing on October 10, 2011.

In a very ironic and timely twist on this, Mr. Koziol’s case will be conferenced by the Justices of the United States Supreme Court tomorrow, October 14, 2011, for a possible precedent setting decision. On the other case in New York City, the United States Justice Department, New York Attorney General and defense firms, have secured extension for their briefs and arguments.

For a fuller description of Mr. Koziol’s efforts to reform laws that harm parent-child relationships, please visit: www.leonkoziol.com. Leon Koziol is available for commentary regarding this current news story and pending litigation. He can be reached at (315) 796-4000. We are also asking our regular followers to please share this story with regional and national media connections.

As stated in previous posts, resources have dwindled to nothing in connection with our current cases. We are therefore seeking contributions from all concerned. Such cases would cost individual litigants or groups hundreds of thousands in competent fees and litigation expense. It is therefore crucial for all of our supporters to join us in this effort. A pay pal account has been set up to accept your donation. No matter how great or small it may be, every amount helps. Please consider this using the method provided below or by mail to: Parenting Rights Institute; 1518 Genesee Street; Utica, New York 13502. Once again, we would like to thank all of you for your help.

See CNN News Story (Click Here)

Fed Up With Parenting Abuse? Join Our Federal Court Action Today!

FED  UP  WITH  PARENTING  ABUSE  IN  OUR  COURTS?  JOIN OUR FEDERAL  TEST  CASE  TODAY!

You can persist in the costly court battles, type away on your keyboards, and complain endlessly about a dysfunctional divorce, custody and support process in our state courts. You can also protest in the streets, burn yourself alive like Thomas Ball did, or take the law into your own hands as so many victims are doing today. Maybe even, you will take up a fledgling cause brewing among our followers known as “Occupy The Family Court” patterned off of the Wall Street protests. Or, you can join a federal lawsuit working its way to the Supreme Court known as Parent v State. This case is on track for setting precedent against abusive court processes which impair our fundamental rights of parenting.

You probably did not know such a right or lawsuit even existed. This is because, like the Thomas Ball incident, it is being suppressed by a multi-billion dollar child control industry. Whenever you enter a Family Court, Probate Court or divorce court with children at issue, the state takes virtual control of every aspect of a right which our Supreme Court has consistently described as the “oldest liberty interest” protected by the American Constitution. However, the same court has never established a constitutional limit to these state invasions of family privacy unlike other areas such as abortion and gun control. The time is long overdue for such a limit so that your liberties in childrearing and our family values as a nation may be enhanced.

The Parenting Rights Institute has been promoting this federal lawsuit brought by constitutional rights advocate, Leon R. Koziol, J.D. Filed in United States District Court on February 26, 2009, a federal judge has allowed the plaintiffs to litigate under the assumed identity “John Parent” and “Parents Similarly Situated”. It will soon come up for argument before a federal appeals court in New York City and may wind up before the United States Supreme Court. A related case is already being considered during the current term of the high court on a petition for certiorari. You can verify the Second Circuit docket number 11-2474 and learn more about this precedent seeking litigation by reading the entire Parent brief at www.leonkoziol.com.

Many followers of this site have contacted us for purposes of joining this case, even identifying their lawyers and personal backgrounds. However, formal joinder of parties would cost individuals many thousands of dollars depending upon the experience and competency of legal counsel retained by each. It would also complicate and delay progress for years. For this reason, we are offering our supporters the opportunity of informal joinder without the need for costly fees. We are creating a list of “parents similarly situated” to become a potential class member of this lawsuit. Any person who donates $100 or more to our cause will have the option of being named to this list. It may make you and your child a part of the legal history of this nation.

We already have a list in the making thanks to our early donors. However much more support is needed to cover the herculean costs of these court processes. Mr. Koziol has sacrificed a lucrative career in law and politics to bring this litigation. We cannot and must not allow his efforts to die out. He has already proven his ability to succeed after 23 years of practice in the trial and appellate courts of New York. Three sample cases that he pursued have been cited in earlier releases, including one which resulted in a final judgment declaring the largest casino in New York State unconstitutional, see i.e. Oneida Indian Nation v Oneida County, 132 F. Supp. 2d 71 (NDNY 2000); Patterson v City of Utica, 370 F.3d 322 (2^nd Cir. 2004) and Koziol v Hanna, 107 F. Supp. 2d 170 (NDNY 2000). Kindly pass this on to others.

Please Donate Today!